1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Maybach Landaulet
To start off, 2010 Maybach Landaulet is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach Landaulet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Maybach Landaulet (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 511 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Maybach Landaulet should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2010 Maybach Landaulet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Maybach Landaulet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maybach Landaulet (999 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 820 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Maybach Landaulet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Maybach Landaulet | |
Make | Chrysler | Maybach |
Model | E | Landaulet |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 999 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3828 mm |