1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | E | Titan |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 4060 mm |