1982 Chrysler E vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Peugeot |
| Model | E | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2613 mm |
