1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2011 Ford Bantam is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (93 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2011 Ford Bantam. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 240 kg more than 2011 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Bantam |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |