1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 130 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | E | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1626 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2648 mm |
