1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Ford Ka
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 190 kg more than 2011 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ka. (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Ford Ka | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | E | Ka |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2310 mm |