1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | E | Colorado |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |