1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | E | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
