1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 199 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | E | 2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2489 mm |
