1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 758 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | E | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2875 mm |