1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC60 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | XC60 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1795 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2748 mm |