1982 Chrysler E vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | E | Epica |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
