1982 Chrysler E vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | E | Matrix |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2601 mm |