1982 Chrysler E vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2013 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | Chrysler | Aston Martin |
Model | E | Virage |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 490 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |