1982 Chrysler E vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 200 (353 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | E | 200 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 279 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2765 mm |