1982 Chrysler E vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 77 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia RIO. (167 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | E | RIO |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |