1982 Chrysler E vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 954 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | E | XC90 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2857 mm |