1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1966 Simca 1200S
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 345 kg more than 1966 Simca 1200S.
Because 1966 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1966 Simca 1200S | |
| Make | Chrysler | Simca |
| Model | Le Baron | 1200S |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2240 mm |
