1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Baron | 240 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2740 mm |
