1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 366 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Le Baron | Challenger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 6286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2800 mm |