1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1974 Opel Admiral
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Opel Admiral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Opel Admiral would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Opel Admiral is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Opel Admiral weights approximately 275 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1974 Opel Admiral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Opel Admiral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1974 Opel Admiral | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | Le Baron | Admiral |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2850 mm |