1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,762 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
| Make | Chrysler | De Tomaso |
| Model | Le Baron | Longchamp |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5762 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |
