1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1983 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 350 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1983 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Chrysler | Skoda |
| Model | Le Baron | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 47 L |
