1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1989 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1989 Jaguar XJS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 550 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1989 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1989 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | XJS |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2600 mm |