1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 290 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Le Baron | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2740 mm |