1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1991 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1991 Holden Apollo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Holden Apollo weights approximately 5 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1991 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Le Baron | Apollo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2610 mm |