1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1994 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1994 Ford Falcon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Falcon weights approximately 335 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1994 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1994 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Falcon |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2800 mm |