1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 Holden Statesman
To start off, 1996 Holden Statesman is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Holden Statesman weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1996 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 Holden Statesman | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Le Baron | Statesman |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2830 mm |
