1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 453 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1996 Jaguar XK8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 Jaguar XK8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Baron | XK8 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 291 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1653 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
