1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Musso is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 775 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | Le Baron | Musso |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2640 mm |
