1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1998 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XJR is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 637 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1998 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 1998 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Baron | XJR |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 370 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1837 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 87 L |
