1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2001 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2001 Mazda B4000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2001 Mazda B4000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mazda B4000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2001 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | B4000 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2840 mm |
