1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 300 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2003 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Le Baron | UTE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2950 mm |