1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 278 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | Le Baron | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |
