1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Ferrari Enzo
To start off, 2004 Ferrari Enzo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Ferrari Enzo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ferrari Enzo weights approximately 165 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2004 Ferrari Enzo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ferrari Enzo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Ferrari Enzo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ferrari |
| Model | Le Baron | Enzo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 653 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1365 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 110 L |
