1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2004 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 62 L |