1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 192 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 61 L |