1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 465 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2005 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Jaguar S-Type | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | S-Type |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 294 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |