1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
