1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2006 Panoz Esperante is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Panoz Esperante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Panoz Esperante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Panoz Esperante | |
Make | Chrysler | Panoz |
Model | Le Baron | Esperante |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |