1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Forester weights approximately 380 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
| Model | Le Baron | Forester |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 60 L |
