1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 588 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
| Model | Le Baron | CTS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1788 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2890 mm |
