1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 975 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Le Baron | ML |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 382 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2913 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 95 L |
