1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2011 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XJ is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 596 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2011 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2011 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | XJ |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 271 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 82 L |