1982 Citroen BX vs. 1950 Rover P4
To start off, 1982 Citroen BX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,103 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rover P4 (74 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rover P4 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1982 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen BX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Rover P4 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1950 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen BX | 1950 Rover P4 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | BX | P4 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 65.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 986 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 52 L |