1982 Citroen BX vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen BX would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Citroen BX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen BX | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | BX | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 84 L |