1982 Citroen BX vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen BX would be higher. At 3,494 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu KB (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu KB should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen BX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (281 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen BX | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | BX | KB |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3494 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 93.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |
