1982 Citroen BX vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen BX would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen BX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen BX | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | BX | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 986 kg | 1171 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |