1982 Citroen BX vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen BX would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen BX | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | BX | 5 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |
