1982 Citroen BX vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen BX would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Citroen BX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1982 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen BX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen BX. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen BX | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | BX | 3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |